A growing class action lawsuit is looking for more plaintiffs to bring Apple to court over its iMac and MacBook.
The accusation? That by selling a computer without a dust filter, Apple deliberately ignores something that can disrupt the "function and use" of high-end screens.
"Owners of iMac and MacBook have reported dark spots and spots on the inside of their desktop computer screens, as well as excessive slowness and damage to their computers related to the lack of filters on Apple computers," a picture of visible defects. note. "The computer absorbs air to cool its components, but without a filter, dust is trapped in it. This affects the computer's screen and logic board, causing dust to stick behind the screen and damage the motherboard, causing the computer to run slowly and / or overheat. "
This pudding affects the allegations that have the most impact on people who use their Mac for activities including illustrations, photo editing, and other visual applications. It seems the kick is relatively soon after purchase, "but after Apple's standard warranty period has ended."
The lawsuit alleged that Apple knew about this problem, but did nothing. Instead, users must pay "more than $ 500" to fix screen problems. This can increase more if they need to replace other parts affected because of this problem.
Hagens Berman, the law firm behind the class action lawsuit, previously took Apple to court in 2016 because of its role in the alleged scandal over the pricing scandal. The lawyer did not mention the name proposed in the case of damage in this case. However, he noted that he hoped the court would decide "reasonable costs to be given." No class member had to pay for himself in any scenario.
Regardless of whether you think that the Mac should be equipped with a built-in dust filter, this lawsuit is related to a much larger problem addressed to Apple. It was the idea that Apple made premium devices designed with obsolescence in mind.
This accusation has been raised based on "evidence" like Apple slowing down older devices with software updates and its tendency to glue components in place, making repairs or upgrades for certain difficult products. Apple also has the right to improve the law, and introduce new software steps which means that only Apple's authorized workshops can repair newer Macs with T2 chips.
Apple, for its part, has a good argument to suggest why this decision was made – and it's not about messing up end users. However, these ongoing suggestions are likely to play a role in class action claims like this one.
Have you ever experienced a certain "smudging" problem alleged in this lawsuit? Let us know in the comments below.