A drunken fight then erupted between the men and two jurists, who were shot and seriously injured in an inappropriate spectacle which resulted in the Indiana Supreme Court temporarily suspending them without paying this week for their disrespectful actions in the morning. May 1.
"Respondents' actions are not just embarrassing on a personal level; they discredit the entire Indiana court," the state's Supreme Court said on Tuesday.
The verdict said judges – Andrew Adams of the Clark 1 Circuit Court, Bradley B. Jacobs of the Clark 2 Circuit Court and Sabrina R. Bell of the Crawford Circuit Court – were involved in judicial violations. and behave "in a rash way" during a drunken brawl in a restaurant parking lot in downtown Indianapolis.
"I wholeheartedly apologize for my behavior that night that embarrassed the Indiana Supreme Court, my fellow judges and all members of my chosen profession. I cannot offer any reason for the evening's event or I am not trying to offer them any reason. choice, "Jacobs said in a statement his lawyer read to reporters.
"I am fully aware of the shame that I bring to the Indiana Judiciary, my family and especially my community. Not a single minute on that day I did not think about the significant impact of my actions. I take full responsibility for my actions because they did not meet my expectations. or the hope given to me as a court office, "Adams said in the statement, according to Star.
CNN has contacted Bell to comment.
Adams, Bell and Jacobs arrived in Indianapolis to attend Spring Judicial College on April 30 and began socializing and drinking with other court officials that night, the ruling said.
At around 3am the next morning, the judges walked together to a naked club, the document said. But the club is closed and they are running to the nearby White Castle restaurant.
As they stood outside in the White Castle parking lot, two men passed by and shouted something to the three judges outside the window of their vehicle. Bell turned the people over, the document said, and they entered the parking lot and the five began to argue.
The verdict said Bell was drunk at the time and had no memory of the incident or what was said to incite him.
But it was noted that he told detectives at the scene, "I feel this is all my fault."
Bell said the three were good friends and other judges protected him, the ruling said.
"I was afraid that I said something to the two strange men at first, and then they said something to me. And then I said something and then [Adams and Jacobs] go to defend me, "said Bell, according to the ruling.
He added, "I am not denying that I said anything or biting it … because I drink … I mean, I fully admit that I drink and gargle, and I am fiery and I am excited, but if I will think for a moment that they will fight or that the man has weapons on him, I never will, never will. "
The verbal argument changed physically, with Jacobs bringing one of the men to the ground and Adams kicking him from behind.
The fight ended when the man pulled out a gun, shot Adams once and Jacobs twice, the document said. The men were taken to a local hospital and underwent emergency surgery.
On September 9, Adams pleaded guilty to charges of minor battery violations resulting in bodily injury. He was sentenced to 365 days in prison, with 363 days suspended.
He was also suspended without pay for 60 days, while Jacobs and Bell were suspended without pay for 30 days.
The Indiana Supreme Court ruled that by engaging in conflict, the judges did not have their direction to "aspire at any time to do that ensures maximum public confidence in independence, impartiality, integrity, and competence."
The man accused of shooting the judge is scheduled to stand trial in January on a number of charges, including an aggravated battery of crime.
Monica Haider from CNN contributed to this report.[ad_2]