New detection of fetal pregnancy "genetically modified"



[ad_1]

id = "firstBodyDiv" data-bind-html-content-type = "article" data-bind-html-compile = "article.body" data-first-article-body = "

On Monday, an initial investigation confirmed that a second woman had become pregnant with the fetus, media reported on Monday "Genetically modified", and that it would be under medical supervision, without giving further details about them, according to a newspaper "Letter Daily "English

A biomedical scientist at Stanford University in California, William Harlept, who knew the Chinese scientist was Jianqui Genetic modificationIt was "very early to get an embryo based on ultrasonographic imaging".

Harleft said: "Giancoe taught me about pregnancy at the Human Genome conference in Jakarta Hong Kong In November. I think the fetus was still very young and could not be detected clinically ", according to Agence France-Presse.

The world shows that he did not meet Giancoi after the conference, to put the latter under a security guard.

Last November, Chinese authorities launched an investigation into the Jianqui process, which used new tools to rewrite the twins' genetic code before they were born.

The Chinese National Health Authority ordered the action "Immediate Investigation" in this process, mainly because the world did not provide evidence to prove its operation, and did not disclose details related to the identity of the two children, "The Guardian" of the United Kingdom

Giancoi explained that he had made genetic modifications to the embryos of 7 women during their conception treatment and gave birth to one of them, noting that what he did was not a form of treatment or prevention of genetic diseases, but an effort to give status to some people. , The ability to fight infectious diseases in the future, such as AIDS virus.

The world refuses to reveal parents of genetically modified babies, and refuses to disclose their existence, clinics or hospitals where genetic modification is carried out.

There is no independent confirmation of his health, nor has it been published in scientific journals so that experts and other scientists can assess its accuracy or accuracy.

This step has angered the scientific community in various parts of the world, mainly because it is considered an "Experiment on humans", a step that is legally prohibited in many countries.

">

On Monday, initial investigations confirmed that the second woman had a "genetically modified" embryo and that she would be under medical supervision, without giving further details, according to the Daily Mail newspaper.

"It's too early to get an embryo based on ultrasound," said William Harlebt, a biomedical scientist at Stanford University in California who knows Chinese scientist Giancui.

"Gianqui taught me about pregnancy at the Human Genome Conference in Hong Kong in November, I think the fetus is still very young at that time and cannot be detected clinically," Harlebt said.

The world shows that he did not meet Giancoi after the conference, to put the latter under a security guard.

Last November, Chinese authorities launched an investigation into the Jianqui process, which used new tools to rewrite the twins' genetic code before they were born.

The National Health Commission of China has ordered an "immediate investigation" of the operation, mainly because the world has not provided evidence of its operation, and no details of the identity of the two children were disclosed, the Guardian reported.

Giancoi explained that he had made genetic modifications to the embryos of 7 women during their conception treatment and gave birth to one of them, noting that what he did was not a form of treatment or prevention of genetic diseases, but an effort to give status to some people. , The ability to fight infectious diseases in the future, such as HIV / AIDS.

The world refuses to reveal parents of genetically modified babies, and refuses to disclose their existence, clinics or hospitals where genetic modification is carried out.

There is no independent confirmation of his health, nor has it been published in scientific journals so that experts and other scientists can assess its accuracy or accuracy.

This step has angered the scientific community around the world, mainly because it is seen as a "human experiment," a move that is legally prohibited in many countries.

[ad_2]

Source link