Ljubljana Major Zoran Janković has rejected the court's decision in the Gratel case to accept a bribe of 500,000 euros, which he allegedly obtained for the municipality. "I think I would be guilty if I did not do what they accused me of," said the mayor, who claimed that the city government received compensation, not bribes.
Ljubljana's confidant Zoran Jankovic & # 263 ;, in the case of Gratel, the crime of bribery that he was supposed to get for the city property did not admit a mistake at the pre-trial hearing. & # 160; & # 34;I thought it would be a mistake if I didn't do what they said to me,& # 34; at the beginning of the trial, said the judge Vladislavi Lunder.
He added that he did not have to be in court today because he had a paid service route, but he did not want to be a member of the court. to sod & # 39; & # 269; a. & # 160;
How about him?
"class =" ng-star-insert ">
Mayor of Ljubljana Zoran Jankovic,in the Gratel case, he was found guilty of a bribery, which he allegedly obtained for the municipality, at a pre-trial hearing. "I thought it would be my fault if I didn't do what they complained to me,"said the judge at the beginning of the trial Vladislavi Lunder.
He added that today he did not have to be in court because he had planned a career, but he went out to honor the court.
What are they complaining about?
<span innerhtml = "
Jankovi & # 263; had to request EUR 500,000 from Gratel in March 2007, in return, it would allow the company to cancel public services in the construction of a cable network, which was banned by the expiration of prior authorization shortly after its election. Gratel then paid € 250,000 in two installments in Ljubljana as a contribution to the reconstruction of Ljubljana Castle and continued his work in accordance with the newly issued license.
This is Yankee # & # 263; refusing to do so with a hi-tech investigation in February 2014, denying that he claimed a donation, but "this is a guarantee that he was able to remove the code he had because of Gratel's behavior." ############### ################################################# A contract for the purpose of "has been made a deal with him about the reasonable code he made, because in the case of the cable channel being flooded, he sometimes "# 353; turn on the channel and into it polo & # 269; Pipe as it should.
Oblique in this case became legal in February this year. Jankovi & # 263; I was of the opinion, but the extra-judicial panel rejected his overall objection. & # 34;There is no point in using it, because it tells me that as a "conqueror" I get the benefits of city property, which, after all, the task "hopes,& # 34; commented on Janko & # 263;
"class =" ng-star-insert ">
In March 2007, Janković was asked to request 500,000 euros from Gratel, in return, he would allow the company again to overthrow public space in the construction of a cable network, which banned it shortly after the election. Gratel then paid 250,000 euros in two installments to the municipality of Ljubljana as a contribution to the reconstruction of Ljubljana castle and continued its work in accordance with the newly issued license.
Janković has denied charges of prosecution of a house search in February 2014, denying that he claimed the donation, but according to his conviction it was removing damage suffered by the municipality from the treatment of Gratel. This allegedly violated the contract, which is why the municipality closed the agreement with him about paying for the damage he had made, because in the case of overflowing cable channels, he expanded the channel somewhere and placed several tubes in front of him than he should.
The charges in this case were final in February this year. Janković objected to the charge, but the panel was rejected by the Room as a whole. "The indictment is of no use, because it tells me that as a mayor I get benefits from the municipal municipality, which, after all, is also the duty of the mayor,"Jankovic commented.
<span innerhtml = "
Against Ljubljana & vice versa, you & # 269; procedure
The following week, Ljubljana's referral was a court of caution, in Sto? Jankovi & # 263; he will enter before the judge. as well as many years after high-quality hi-tech investigations in September 2012. & # 160;
This & # 382; ilstvo Jankovic & # 263; u & # 160; and soobto & # 382; one & # 160; o & # 269; it's your signature in their view, the contract in question in you & # 353; the amount of EUR 1.8 million for parking is leased allegedly fictitious & # 353; & # 269; In Sto. With this step, Grep became a creditworthy company and, at NLB, could employ more in 2010; as a 50 million euro loan. However, with this, I have made 9.4 million co-financing from the Slovenian budget and European funds.
The trial against Janko is "more". The Ljubljana Appellate Court found that in April last year, Janko was legally freed from abuse of a cruel situation in Ni, # 353; President of the Mercator Management Board.
There are always ongoing trials for alleged misuse of money and money laundering in connection with purchase contracts and attachments for the purchase of a place from the central cooling machine room in Stochy Park, as well as for criminal violations of official position misuse, fraud in obtaining loans, forgery or destruction of business documents relating to the rehabilitation of gravel pits in Stochies, Grepa paid more for 1.4 million euros. This investigation is investigating the claim that he must avoid paying taxes on profits from capital in the sale of Mercator shares.
Also known is the fate of at least five pre-trial procedures, charges for Ljubljana's charges of criminal offenses for taking advantage of illegal mediation and misuse of official positions: Formation studio cases – land sales or replacement, renovation of Slovenia Road, Vo-Ka or Fir cancer tender, Taking public or public procurement, establishment of Casablanca restaurant gardens, as provided by Janko & # 263; he himself stated on his website.
The public echoed the trial presentation from the investigation into the pharmaceutical case, and the procedure for investigating suspicions of criminal offenses receiving bribes was stopped because the collected evidence remained in the file after the presentation of evidence, collected by hidden investigative actions, did not prove suspicion that Janko committed a crime.
"class =" ng-star-insert ">
Some procedures run against the mayor of Ljubljana
The following week, the mayor of Ljubljana was waiting for another pre-litigation demonstration in the Stožice case. Janković will face judges more than six years after searching for high-profile homes in September 2012.
The Janković Prosecutor's Office and fellow accused signed a contract in their opinion of a controversial contract in the amount of 1.8 million euros for rental parking that was allegedly fictional in Stožice. With this step, Grep became a creditworthy company and was able to lease more than 50 million euros from NLB in 2010. However, the municipality reached 9.4 million in joint financing from the Slovenian budget and European funds.
There are even more procedures against Janković. In April last year, the Ljubljana High Court acquitted Janković of allegations of misuse of positions in Niš's case when he was also chairman of the Mercator company management board.
Judicial investigations are still ongoing on allegations of misuse of money and money laundering in connection with purchase contracts and attachments for the purchase of a place from a central cooling machine in Stožice sports park, also for violations of official abuse, fraud in obtaining loans, forgery or destruction of business documents regarding rehabilitation of holes gravel in Stožice, which Jankovic will pay Grep for 1.4 million euros. The prosecutor's office also investigated claims that he would avoid paying taxes on capital gains in the sale of Mercator shares.
It is unknown the fate of at least five pre-trial procedures, charges against mayor Ljubljana for criminal offenses to take advantage of illegal mediation and abuse of official positions: Forming studio cases – sale or replacement of land, renovation of Slovenska cesta, Vo-Ka or calls for Rakova jelša tenders , public ownership or public contracts, construction of the Casablanca Janković restaurant park itself registered on its website.
The public echoed the exclusion of hearings from investigations into pharmaceutical cases, and the process of investigating suspicions of criminal offenses accepting bribes was stopped because the evidence collected in files after the exclusion of evidence collected through covert investigative actions did not justify the suspicion that Jankovic committed a criminal offense.