Monday , June 14 2021

Why spreading fear in fighting HIV and AIDS is poison



By mail
Further by this author

Several steps have been realized in containing the HIV and AIDS pandemic since 1984 when the first case was reported in Kenya.

Through the creation of awareness, this country no longer ignores the disease. Many know about the distribution and control mechanisms.

In addition, ARVs now reach millions of people while prevention of mother-to-child transmission has helped reduce infections in children.

However, the results obtained over the years are gradually emptied by the stigma associated with the disease. Although some have overcome the tag stigma, many others live in denial.

Ignorance of this fact, organizations and volunteers who lead anti-HIV campaigns are not only normal in their approach, but also lack of skills to deal with complicated topics.

I am not sure whether policies on HIV prevalence are designed to spread fear or inform and provide solutions, because a negative perception approach is a toxic pill that only results in leaky efforts.

First, sexual intimacy is a choice. But carelessness is done by sexual behavior and choices that make a person face risks.

Again, the presence of more friendly choices such as condom use stimulates irresponsible behavior among sexually active people.

Behavior changes and vote choices are very important in reversing risky engagement.

HIV testing is voluntary in accordance with the 2009 HIV and AIDS Prevention and Control Act. This action further guarantees the privacy and confidentiality of patients in addition to protecting those infected from discrimination.

Meanwhile, strategic proposals, such as partner management systems, do not have clarity about their implementation under what is called a network without violating constitutional provisions.

In addition, this approach can trigger network network expansion if the premature mask is opened.

The prevalence of spirals across age brackets is a consequence of an untested policy approach. Messages and targeting of blind groups only facilitate a shift in prevalence to other groups that are considered safer.

Public perception is key when it comes to social involvement. If and when it comes, an assessment of its impact must be made to avoid a boomerang

Incidentally, sexuality is complicated and difficult to do. The only way out of changing swamps is to devise strategies for less risky choices by formulating policy strategies that offer solutions and not spread fear. Fear of contracting HIV is unfounded.

Again, the broad view that infected people can only be thin with failing health is very unfortunate, the need to dig deeper into topical topics related to the spirit of adoption into the topic of sexuality.

Let's overcome the gray area that offers protection to cynical people. Among them were questions of disagreement, doctor-patient confidentiality, church recognition and miracles, and so on.


Source link