Bill Anders participated in the Apollo 8 mission which managed to orbit the Moon, and today considers that it is inappropriate to send people to step on Mars.
In recent years, humanity has focused on analyzing the possibility of new spatial achievements: reaching Mars. Prominent figures such as Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos insist that this milestone can be achieved immediately. However, there is a contradiction with this idea even among those who already know space.
Before humans could walk on the Moon on July 16, 1969, all possible scenarios needed for the Apollo 11 mission to succeed. That is why many surveillance and analysis missions are made from the possible dangers of landings on natural satellites.
Among the missions before the landing in the mythical month was Apollo 8. It took off in 1968 and was able to orbit the Moon for 20 hours, giving 10 rounds around it. He then returned to Earth as a success and increased enthusiasm for the release of Apollo 11 next year.
Anyone will say that everyone who works to allow Neil Armstrong to step on the moon will agree to do the same on Mars. However, this does not apply to Anders' crew from Apollo 8 William (& # 39; Bill & # 39;).
Recently in an interview with BBC Radio 5 Live, Anders said it was a bad idea to send people to Mars. He not only criticized the idea of going to the red planet, but said that manned missions would be "almost ridiculous".
The 85-year-old eksastronaut said he considered himself "a defender of an unmanned mission." Their reason is simple: the price is much cheaper. In addition, consider that there is currently no motivating to do so:
What's important? What drives us to go to Mars? (…) I don't think the public is very interested. "
This criticism fell like a pack of cold water when there was a lot of pressure to reach Mars. After all, the question arises: why does someone who works to reach the Moon strongly oppose achieving the following? Of course, that certainly won't stop them from trying to achieve this goal.
A NASA critic
Anders himself knew that he was not so popular at NASA. The reason was that he was always very critical of the decisions taken after the success of Apollo 11. For example, he currently doubted that the agency would achieve that achievement again:
Today, NASA cannot reach the Moon. It's too rusty … This has become a program that gives jobs and many of its departments are not interested in staying busy. It can be seen that there is not much public interest beyond the fact that their workers receive their salaries and their congressmen are re-elected. "
In addition, he has criticized the space shuttle program, the International Space Station and even the idea of placing colonies on the Moon and Mars.