Jeromy Farkas adviser in the booth as a member of the board prepares budget negotiations in Calgary on Monday 26 November 2018. Darren Makowichuk / Postmedia
A second day of important consideration about the proposed four-year city budget saw a city council member convicted by his colleagues for causing "reputation damage" at the town hall.
The dispute began when Coun. Jeromy Farkas accused his colleagues of the council of "bullying behavior," indicating they had "held a strike" when he spoke during a closed meeting about labor negotiations – a statement firmly rejected by his colleagues Tuesday.
"When you play with fire, this can happen. If you continually treat your colleagues with disrespect (later) why do you expect respect again? "Mayor Naheed Nenshi said on Tuesday after Farkas tried to raise the issue in public after a meeting in front of the camera.
"You must be willing to say the same thing around this table that you say to the press. I hope you will use this as an opportunity to reflect on your behavior. "
Some council members said Tuesday that they took exception to public comments made by Farkas in the past that "disrupted the integrity and reputation" of elected and unelected officials, and city hall agencies.
Some board members said Farkas was responsible for spreading "false information" about the city council's staff and pensions.
Others seem to be offended by the recent insinuation of Farkas's vagueness about the practice of cities giving money to board members who set out to apply for tokens for their services.
In recent years, in lieu of gifts such as watches or rings, board members were offered a $ 500 check for their own gift service purchases. Veteran board member Ray Jones said on Tuesday that the practice came after gold prices sent ring costs into thousands.
"We will not pay for the ring, so we say we will put money for rings or hours and that depends on who they choose," Jones said, adding that board members who leave after the 2017 city election are given money for the purpose .
Coun. Jeff Davison said he had come out of the meeting on camera Tuesday because he was upset and as a result of the conversation which deviated from the topic.
"Maybe he feels oppressed, maybe he doesn't," Davison said after a heated debate. "The fact is that he seems to open his mouth with the intention of causing damage and damage to the reputation of this company, to the city, to administration, to 14 other people around the table with him.
"Enough already. I think that's what you see here today. "
Asked later about a reprimand from his colleagues, Farkas said "it's not about me."
"I am not apologizing for fighting for the people I represent," Farkas said.
"I will not let things be personal."